The Growing Risk of Nuclear War and the Role of Healthcare Professionals

*The translation of this article in French, German, Portuguese and Spanish has been made through machine translation and has not been edited yet. we apologise for any inaccuracies.

In an increasingly uncertain world, healthcare professionals (HCPs) find themselves confronted with an unprecedented challenge – addressing the growing risk of nuclear war. What role should HCPs take in reducing the risk of nuclear war? Find out what over 4200 HCPs think in the latest M3 Pulse survey about today’s nuclear war concerns.

Are you prepared to take on the role of addressing the growing risk of nuclear war as a healthcare provider? Share your view in the comment section below.

Early this year, The Science and Security Board of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists moved the Doomsday Clock 90 seconds closer to midnight, indicating an increased risk of nuclear war. The UN Secretary-General has also warned of a nuclear danger not seen since the Cold War. Tensions among nuclear-armed states have heightened concerns. The growing risk of nuclear war is a threat that affects us all, regardless of our profession or background.

In response to the growing threats of atomic war, an unexpected message from the healthcare community has emerged. An editorial published in numerous medical journals worldwide put forth a call for help to HCPs worldwide, asking them to alert citizens and leaders about “the major danger to public health” posed by nuclear weapons.

The editorial stresses the inadequacy of current nuclear arms control efforts, highlighting the catastrophic consequences that even a “limited” nuclear war could bring. It calls for urgent action to prevent nuclear weapon use and passionately advocates for the complete elimination of nuclear arsenals to safeguard humanity. But what role should HCPs take when it comes to addressing the growing risk of nuclear war?

This plea from the healthcare community is not without precedent. HCPs have played a crucial role in advocating for nuclear disarmament during the Cold War era and more recently in the development of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). The medical community understands the devastating consequences of nuclear conflict on public health and well-being.

Growing risk of nuclear war

HCPs Historical Role in Nuclear War Mitigation

During the height of the Cold War, HCPs were at the forefront of efforts to raise awareness about the health consequences of atomic war. They understood that beyond the immediate destruction caused by nuclear explosions, the long-term health effects could be catastrophic. These effects ranged from radiation sickness to the spread of deadly diseases, and HCPs were instrumental in communicating these risks to the public.

One notable example of their involvement is the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW), an organisation that bring together HCPs from around the world to campaign against nuclear weapons. Their efforts culminated in the Nobel Peace Prize in 1985, a testament to the impact of HCPs advocacy in the fight against nuclear war.

Should HCPs actively engage in educating the public and policymakers about the health consequences of nuclear war? Or should they, as some argue, focus solely on medical issues, and leave nuclear disarmament to political leaders? These questions lie at the heart of a complex ongoing debate.

atomic war

HCPs Views on Their Role in Reducing the Risk of Nuclear War: M3 Pulse Results

To gain a deeper understanding of HCPs perspectives on what role HCPs believe they should play in addressing the growing risk of nuclear war, the latest M3 Pulse survey asked over 4200 M3 members across Europe and the USA for their opinions.

Do you agree with the below results as a healthcare provider? Share your opinion in the comment section below.

*Please select your language

M3 Pulse is a one-question online survey we conduct every month with our M3 panel members. It´s a fun and easy way to share your opinions about trending healthcare topics with a global community of healthcare professionals. If you want to participate in this month´s M3 Pulse, register and join the M3 panel today.

Among the 4271 respondents, 59% of HCPs believe the healthcare community should actively engage in educating the public and policymakers about the health consequences of nuclear war, while 18% think the healthcare community should focus solely on medical issues and leave nuclear disarmament to political leaders.

8% answered that the healthcare community should prioritise its own professional development and not get involved in broader global issues like nuclear disarmament, and 6% believe HCPs should avoid involvement in nuclear disarmament efforts.

The remaining 8% feel unsure what role HCPs should take in addressing the growing risk of nuclear war.

Out of the 59% of respondents who think the healthcare community has a vital role in educating and actively engaging in reducing the growing risk of nuclear war received a follow-up question to demonstrate their readiness to personally take action.

Over 50% responded they were ready but would need guidance and training, while 7% felt fully prepared and confident to take on the role of addressing the growing risk of atomic war. 23% feel moderately prepared and need to seek out resources to do so and 17% do not feel confident and are unsure how to convey this responsibility.

These diverse responses reflect the complexities of the issue and underline the importance of considering whether HCPs should take on the responsibility of addressing the growing risk of nuclear war.

risk of nuclear war

Debating HCPs Role in Addressing Nuclear War Concerns

The survey results shed light on the multifaceted debate over HCPs involvement in addressing the risk of nuclear war. While a significant majority support active engagement in public education and advocacy efforts, dissenting voices pose valid questions.

The role of HCPs in addressing the growing risk of nuclear war remains a topic of global discussion and debate. This question demands thoughtful consideration, weighing their potential impact against other pressing healthcare priorities. This debate transcends professional ethics; it’s a matter of global significance.

As we grapple with nuclear war concerns, one undeniable consideration emerges: HCPs possess a unique platform and expertise that can contribute to public awareness and, potentially, global peace. Whether they should embrace this role is a question each HCP must ponder, acknowledging the complexities of this critical issue.

The growing risk of nuclear war compels us all to confront a pivotal question: should HCPs assume this responsibility? Shouldn’t we all? The answer hinges not only on survey responses but also on the collective conscience of the healthcare community and society at large.

If you found this article on the role of HCPs in addressing the growing risk of nuclear war and the M3 Pulse survey results interesting, make sure to leave a comment with your own views below and share it with a colleague via social media:

Join our Panel!

Did you find this M3 Pulse survey about nuclear war concerns interesting?

Join the largest panel of healthcare professionals to take part in the next M3 Pulse and get rewarded when you share your opinions

Join Our Panel!

Did you find this M3 Pulse survey interesting?

Join the largest panel of healthcare professionals to take part in the next M3 Pulse and get rewarded when you share your opinions

Learn About Healthcare Market Research:


  1. I’m not an HCP, but I used to work alongside IPPNW and some of its national affiliates like Physicians for Social Responsibility (USA), so I wanted to thank you for raising this topic.

  2. As a healthcare professional, I believe the health community should play a crucial role in addressing the growing risk of nuclear war. Here are a few key roles they can take:

    1. Public Education: Healthcare professionals can raise awareness about the catastrophic health consequences of nuclear war and educate the public on the importance of prevention and disarmament.

    2. Advocacy: They can actively advocate for policies that promote nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation, and arms control, emphasizing the health implications of nuclear weapons.

    3. Research: Healthcare professionals can contribute to research efforts on the long-term health effects of nuclear war, including radiation sickness, trauma, mental health, and environmental impacts.

    4. Preparedness: They can collaborate with public health agencies to develop emergency response plans for nuclear incidents and ensure healthcare systems are prepared to handle mass casualties and radiation-related injuries.

    5. Collaboration: Healthcare professionals can engage with organizations working on nuclear disarmament and peacebuilding to promote dialogue, cooperation, and the reduction of nuclear risks.

    By leveraging their expertise and influence, the health community can contribute significantly to raising awareness, advocating for policies, and taking concrete actions to address the growing risk of nuclear war and safeguard human health.

    1. Hi David Uchendu,
      Thank you for sharing these insights with us and the M3 community, they are valuable.
      /M3 Team

Leave a Reply

Join Today

Registration is free and only takes a few clicks

Panel Members

Check your available studies

latest posts


The Neuroscience of Dopamine: How to Stay Motivated?

What are the best ways to stay motivated despite heavy workloads and hardships as a healthcare professional? Read more about the neuroscience of dopamine, how to stay motivated, and the latest M3 Pulse results on which practices healthcare professionals use to stay motivated.

Psychoneuroimmunoendocrinology - mind-body connection

Exploring PNIE: The Mind-Body Connection

Explore the fascinating field of Psychoneuroimmunoendocrinology (PNIE), a discipline that investigates the interconnections between our mind, nervous system, immune system, and endocrine system.