Abortion Laws and Women´s Healthcare

*The translation of this article in French and Portuguese has been made through machine translation and has not been edited yet. we apologise for any inaccuracies.

In August, We Asked Over 6,300 Healthcare Professionals for Their Opinions on Abortion and Healthcare in Our Monthly M3 Pulse survey.

Since the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade on 24 June 2022, discussions around changes in U.S. state abortion laws and the effect they will have on the delivery of women’s healthcare, and the impact on society at large, continue to unfold. Read healthcare professionals opinions on this matter.

Roe v Wade was a landmark lawsuit filed in 1970, challenging Texas abortion laws. Jane Roe (legal alias) was seeking to terminate her pregnancy, but at the time, surgical abortion procedures were illegal in Texas unless deemed necessary to save the mother’s life. Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favour of Roe on the basis of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, declaring that this ‘right to privacy’ extends to the constitutional right to abortion.

However, the controversial case did not guarantee an absolute right to abortion but instead helped defined the framework to balance U.S. states’ interests with privacy rights. As one of the most famous rulings in U.S. history, Roe v. Wade changed the way states regulate abortions with many advocating for stricter abortion laws by placing restrictions on abortions in certain circumstances, for example, late-term abortions.

Globally, abortion is still illegal in over twenty countries with around one hundred countries legalising procedures, albeit with some restrictions. Since 2000, women living in thirty-eight countries have the right to abortion, including Argentina, Thailand, Mexico, South Korea, and New Zealand. 95% of all European countries offer abortion on request (regardless of the reason) during the first trimester of pregnancy. Abortion is legal at any point in the pregnancy should the woman’s life or health become endangered. Only six countries in Europe maintain highly restrictive abortion laws, with two countries, Andorra and Malta, not allowing abortions under any circumstances.

Since overturning the Roe v Wade ruling in June 2022 many states in the U.S. have since restored anti-abortion laws, restricting the availability of procedures or setting gestational limits.

Whilst much as the world has achieved progress in securing women’s and reproductive rights, abortion remains one of the most divisive issues globally with discussion on women’s rights to reproductive autonomy versus the rights to protect potential human life. Although the right to safe and legal abortion has been established as a human right by numerous international frameworks on abortion laws, discussions at a national and international level continue.

M3 Pulse Results | 6,300 Healthcare Professionals’ Opinions on US Abortion Laws

Last month, we asked the M3 panel what the impact of restricting legal access to abortion will be due to the overturning of Roe v Wade. Over 6,300 healthcare professionals globally shared their opinions in our M3 Pulse survey about this important matter in abortion laws.

Interestingly, one-third of respondents elected to share their opinions in the comment section under “other answers”, instead of selecting one of the multiple-answer options, highlighting the very nuanced nature of the subject. Check out the results below about this important matter on abortion laws.

As a Healthcare Provider, What Impact do You Expect to See in States and Countries Where, Due to Abortion Laws, Abortion Is No Longer Legal?

*Please select your language

27% of respondents believe that in states or countries where abortion laws have made access to abortion severely restricted, the number of illegal abortions will increase. 19% predict that there will be an increase in maternal deaths, and 16% believe there will be a negative impact on women’s access to education and work. By contrast, only 5% believe that fewer pregnancies will be terminated, therefore protecting the rights of unborn children. Only 1% of all respondents thought that there will not be any impact.

32% of all respondents shared verbatim responses covering a wide range of opinions including there would be an increase in the number of unwanted children being born, resulting in increased neglect or abuse leading to a traumatic childhood. Respondents were concerned that there may be more abandoned babies but also an increase in need for foster and social care. Respondents also shared their fears for the mental health of women, increased suicide rates, and the impact of regressive women’s rights. One respondent reported that many mental health services are already underfunded and provision limited, with long waiting lists for treatment.

A number of respondents welcomed the changes in the abortion laws and believed that there will be minimal impact on women, with some suggesting there were positives as women would no longer have a difficult choice to make. Improving access to sexual health education was also seen as a factor in limiting the need for abortions in the first place. Some mentioned that increasing the availability of elective sterilization procedures (hysterectomies or vasectomies) could also avoid the risk of accidental pregnancies.

Some respondents are concerned about a potential increase in costs and pressure on healthcare systems in countries where abortions are legal, suggesting that women would travel to gain access to legalised procedures by abortion laws.

A number of medical professionals stated that healthcare professionals may choose to relocate depending on their beliefs. Some fear harassment based on their decisions and cite challenges in practicing medicine available to all vs. making decisions according to their personal beliefs. It was also mentioned that fewer medical students may consider careers in obstetrics and gynaecology and choose to practice in different fields of medicine. There were also some respondents who suggested that increasing the time limit on availability of abortions, to, for example, 15 weeks, could also help as there would be more opportunity for the mother to make an informed decision about her options in her own time.

One respondent summed up the issues best in stating that there is no simple answer to this question regarding women’s healthcare. Yes, many unborn lives will be saved, but women will still choose abortions and may choose unsafe methods or increase the strain on their finances when their right to choose is withdrawn, negatively impacting women’s healthcare and women’s rights in general.

How Do You Feel About the Changes in Women's Healthcare and Abortion Laws in General Since Roe v. Wade Has Been Overturned?

Share your thoughts in the comment section below and make sure to register for free to participate in our next M3 Pulse survey. As an M3 member remember you also get access to paid healthcare market research studies.

Results From Our Last M3 Pulse Surveys

Are healthcare professionals concerned about the Monkeypox outbreak? In our latest M3 Pulse survey, we asked 3,050 healthcare professionals their opinions about… Read more.

Are healthcare professionals concerned about the Monkeypox outbreak?

 M3 Global Research conducted two different online surveys in June about Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with our M3 Panel, one for healthcare professionals and… Read more.

Alzheimer´s Disease and Dementia: how to improve brain health?

Not a Member of Our Panel Yet?

Are you working as a health care professional? Are you looking for different ways to earn an extra income as a healthcare professional? If so, we want to hear about your experiences and opinions.

Not a Member of Our Panel Yet?

Are you working as a health care professional? Are you looking for different ways to earn an extra income as a healthcare professional? If so, we want to hear about your experiences and opinions.


  1. Abortion has always been a difficult personal and morale decision. I believe that the woman should have the right to choose her own way in pregnancy terminations up to a point. In Pathology, we generally have a cutoff point of 22 weeks for deciding if the fetus is a “specimen: or a “child.” A specimen cannot live outside the human body and virtually no baby has survived at less than 22 weeks. Specimens are routinely put out for disposal unless the mother asks for it to have services. After 22 weeks, the baby may be able to live outside the womb with NICU intervention. If the child is lost, the mother needs to decide if the child should be buried or disposed of per hospital policy.
    I believe that 22 weeks is a good cutoff for voluntary abortions (no medical, incest, rape). This gives the mother enough time to make an informed decision.

  2. Abortions have always been a personal choice simply because some woman don’t have the mental or physical support to care for another life.Not everyone grows up with a support system every one has background and that 1% may not be able to take care of another life because of the hardships of their family background or environment.Abortions should not be handled by MEN who are they to tell us we have to bring a life into this world? NOBODY…it’s women out here who gets raped daily by so called FAMILY so with this new overturn you mean to tell me she has to keep her incest of a child due to being forced by someone she trusted No! Abortions should be up to the creator which WOMEN not a bunch of men whose penis doesn’t have a conscience. what impact do I expect to see in states and countries where abortion is no longer legal? Woman are going to take matters into their own hands which may lead to health concerns or possibly death trying to get rid of a life that they know they can’t handle.Honestly I don’t no one has the right to tell me or the next woman to keep a baby I know I’m not personally ready for and if need be I live in a state where it’s illegal I will go to another state to get a abortion.I don’t think it’s how important it is that mentally you have to be ready to bring another life into this world

  3. Even if access to contraception was universal there would always be unwanted pregnancies as no contraception is 100% failsafe. To be forced to have a child when you are not in a position to care for one, for whatever reason, is an horrendous situation for a woman – it should be personal choice and not up to the state.

  4. My body my choice as long as ones well informed before making the decision, one must have freedom of choice.

Leave a Reply

Join Today

Registration is free and only takes a few clicks

Panel Members

Check your available studies

latest posts

emerging respiratory treatments for lung cancer - cystic fibrosis - robotic navigation - gene-editing nanoparticles

Emerging Respiratory Treatments: Frontiers in Pulmonology

Emerging respiratory medicines and treatments, including robotic navigation and gene-editing nanoparticles, may significantly improve patient outcomes in the future for prevalent pulmonary diseases like lung cancer, cystic fibrosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Paid Studies About Medical Devices | M3 Guide

Real-World Evidence studies collect real-world data to evaluate the safety and performance of medical devices. This M3 Guide reveals how we conduct Real-World Evidence studies, how they contribute to better patient outcomes, and how healthcare professionals can get compensated.